Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) vs Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) (A) and Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 98% and 106% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) at 86/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 7.7 percentage points (106.1% vs 98.4%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.
| Metric | Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) | Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 86/100 (A) | 100/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 98.4% | 106.1%* |
| Total Assets | $122.0B | $43.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $124.0B | $41.3B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $2.0B | $0* |
| Participants | 665,000 | 288,395 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 7.2% | 7.3%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Wisconsin | RTX Corporation |
Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) at 86/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 7.7 percentage points (106.1% vs 98.4%). Raytheon Company Pension Plan for Salaried Employees covers 288,395 participants.