Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) vs Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 5.1 percentage points (77.4% vs 72.3%). Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) covers 405,000 participants.
| Metric | Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) | Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 68/100 (B) | 70/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 72.3% | 77.4%* |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $74.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $63.6B* | $95.6B |
| Unfunded Liability | $17.6B* | $21.6B |
| Participants | 588,000 | 405,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8% | 6.0%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Arizona | State of Georgia |
Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 5.1 percentage points (77.4% vs 72.3%). Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) covers 405,000 participants.