Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) vs Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 27.6 percentage points (72.3% vs 44.7%). Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) covers 588,000 participants.
| Metric | Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) | Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 68/100 (B)* | 44/100 (D) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 72.3%* | 44.7% |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $62.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $63.6B* | $140.5B |
| Unfunded Liability | $17.6B* | $77.7B |
| Participants | 588,000 | 424,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8%* | 4.8% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | critical |
| Sponsor | State of Arizona | State of Illinois |
Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 27.6 percentage points (72.3% vs 44.7%). Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) covers 588,000 participants.