Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) vs Maryland State Retirement & Pension System
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to Maryland State Retirement & Pension System at 67/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 0.2 percentage points (72.3% vs 72.1%). Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) covers 588,000 participants.
| Metric | Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) | Maryland State Retirement & Pension System |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 68/100 (B)* | 67/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 72.3%* | 72.1% |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $61.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $63.6B* | $84.6B |
| Unfunded Liability | $17.6B* | $23.6B |
| Participants | 588,000 | 398,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8% | 5.8% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Arizona | State of Maryland |
Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to Maryland State Retirement & Pension System at 67/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 0.2 percentage points (72.3% vs 72.1%). Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) covers 588,000 participants.