Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan vs State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 34.0 percentage points (78.1% vs 44.1%). Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan covers 228,000 participants.
| Metric | Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan | State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 70/100 (B)* | 42/100 (D) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 78.1%* | 44.1% |
| Total Assets | $56.0B | $22.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $71.7B | $51.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $15.7B* | $28.5B |
| Participants | 228,000 | 218,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.7%* | 5.1% |
| Plan Type | corporate | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | critical |
| Sponsor | Boeing Company | State of Illinois |
Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 34.0 percentage points (78.1% vs 44.1%). Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan covers 228,000 participants.