California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) vs Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 58/100 (C) compared to Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 7.2 percentage points (67.3% vs 60.1%). California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) covers 2,050,000 participants.
| Metric | California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) | Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 58/100 (C)* | 54/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 67.3%* | 60.1% |
| Total Assets | $473.0B | $29.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $703.0B | $48.3B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $230.0B | $19.3B* |
| Participants | 2,050,000 | 322,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8%* | 5.3% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | high |
| Sponsor | State of California | State of Mississippi |
California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 58/100 (C) compared to Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 7.2 percentage points (67.3% vs 60.1%). California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) covers 2,050,000 participants.