California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) vs Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 73/100 (B) compared to Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 4.5 percentage points (72.9% vs 77.4%). California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) covers 985,000 participants.
| Metric | California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) | Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 73/100 (B)* | 70/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 72.9% | 77.4%* |
| Total Assets | $318.0B | $74.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $436.0B | $95.6B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $118.0B | $21.6B* |
| Participants | 985,000 | 405,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2%* | 6.0% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of California | State of Georgia |
California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 73/100 (B) compared to Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 4.5 percentage points (72.9% vs 77.4%). California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) covers 985,000 participants.