Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund vs Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 56.1 percentage points (78.1% vs 22.0%). Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan covers 228,000 participants.
| Metric | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund | Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 29/100 (F) | 70/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 22.0% | 78.1%* |
| Total Assets | $9.5B | $56.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $43.2B* | $71.7B |
| Unfunded Liability | $33.7B | $15.7B* |
| Participants | 380,000 | 228,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.5% | 6.7%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | critical | moderate |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Central States | Boeing Company |
Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 56.1 percentage points (78.1% vs 22.0%). Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan covers 228,000 participants.