Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund vs Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund (A) and Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 84% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 10.3 percentage points (94.1% vs 83.8%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

MetricCentral States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundMissouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)*80/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%*83.8%
Total Assets$55.6B$47.0B
Total Liabilities$59.1B$56.1B*
Unfunded Liability$3.5B*$9.1B
Participants634,861220,000
1-Year Investment Return4.5%6.3%*
Plan Typemultiemployerpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorTeamsters Central StatesState of Missouri

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 10.3 percentage points (94.1% vs 83.8%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

Explore More