Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund vs SEIU National Industry Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund (A) and SEIU National Industry Pension Fund (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 98% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

SEIU National Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 99/100 (A) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 3.7 percentage points (97.7% vs 94.1%). SEIU National Industry Pension Fund covers 21,789 participants.

MetricCentral States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundSEIU National Industry Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)99/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%97.7%*
Total Assets$55.6B$272.5M
Total Liabilities$59.1B$278.9M*
Unfunded Liability$3.5B$6.4M*
Participants634,86121,789
1-Year Investment Return4.5%4.9%*
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorTeamsters Central StatesService Employees International Union

SEIU National Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 99/100 (A) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 3.7 percentage points (97.7% vs 94.1%). SEIU National Industry Pension Fund covers 21,789 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons