Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund vs Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund (A) and Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 83% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund at 91/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 11.5 percentage points (94.1% vs 82.6%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

MetricCentral States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundSheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)*91/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%*82.6%
Total Assets$55.6B$7.5B
Total Liabilities$59.1B$9.1B*
Unfunded Liability$3.5B$1.6B*
Participants634,861148,965
1-Year Investment Return4.5%5.3%*
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorTeamsters Central StatesSheet Metal Workers International Association

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund at 91/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 11.5 percentage points (94.1% vs 82.6%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons