Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) vs Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 8.0 percentage points (78.1% vs 70.1%). Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan covers 228,000 participants.
| Metric | Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) | Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 66/100 (B) | 70/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 70.1% | 78.1%* |
| Total Assets | $31.5B | $56.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $44.9B* | $71.7B |
| Unfunded Liability | $13.4B* | $15.7B |
| Participants | 327,000 | 228,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.5% | 6.7%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Texas | Boeing Company |
Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 8.0 percentage points (78.1% vs 70.1%). Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan covers 228,000 participants.