General Electric Pension Plan vs Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to General Electric Pension Plan at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 11.6 percentage points (87.8% vs 76.2%). Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) covers 218,000 participants.
| Metric | General Electric Pension Plan | Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 72/100 (B) | 82/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 76.2% | 87.8%* |
| Total Assets | $38.5B | $36.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $50.5B | $41.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $12.0B | $5.1B* |
| Participants | 318,000 | 218,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.8%* | 6.3% |
| Plan Type | corporate | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | low |
| Sponsor | GE Aerospace (formerly General Electric) | Texas Cities |
Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to General Electric Pension Plan at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 11.6 percentage points (87.8% vs 76.2%). Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) covers 218,000 participants.