General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan vs Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 7.7 percentage points (87.8% vs 80.1%). Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) covers 218,000 participants.
| Metric | General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan | Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 78/100 (B) | 82/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 80.1% | 87.8%* |
| Total Assets | $66.5B | $36.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $83.0B | $41.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $16.5B | $5.1B* |
| Participants | 302,000 | 218,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 7.2%* | 6.3% |
| Plan Type | corporate | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | General Motors | Texas Cities |
Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 7.7 percentage points (87.8% vs 80.1%). Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) covers 218,000 participants.