Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Georgia Employees Retirement System (ERS) vs Delta Air Lines Pilot Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Georgia Employees Retirement System (ERS) and Delta Air Lines Pilot Pension Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Georgia Employees Retirement System (ERS) grades B while Delta Air Lines Pilot Pension Plan grades A. Funding ratios: 77% vs 100%.

Delta Air Lines Pilot Pension Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Delta Air Lines Pilot Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Georgia Employees Retirement System (ERS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 22.8 percentage points (100.0% vs 77.2%). Delta Air Lines Pilot Pension Plan covers 82,801 participants.

MetricGeorgia Employees Retirement System (ERS)Delta Air Lines Pilot Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
70/100 (B)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
77.2%100.0%*
Total Assets$17.8B$7.3B
Total Liabilities$23.1B$7.3B*
Unfunded Liability$5.3B$179.5K*
Participants138,00082,801
1-Year Investment Return5.9%7.3%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorState of GeorgiaDelta Air Lines

Delta Air Lines Pilot Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Georgia Employees Retirement System (ERS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 22.8 percentage points (100.0% vs 77.2%). Delta Air Lines Pilot Pension Plan covers 82,801 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons