Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Honeywell International Pension Plan vs Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Honeywell International Pension Plan (A) and Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 132% and 124% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Honeywell International Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan at 100/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 8.2 percentage points (132.2% vs 124.0%). Honeywell International Pension Plan covers 96,300 participants.

MetricHoneywell International Pension PlanJohnson & Johnson Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)100/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
132.2%*124.0%
Total Assets$16.6B$21.1B
Total Liabilities$12.6B*$17.0B
Unfunded Liability$0$0
Participants96,30083,076
1-Year Investment Return7.2%7.5%*
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorHoneywell InternationalJohnson & Johnson

Honeywell International Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan at 100/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 8.2 percentage points (132.2% vs 124.0%). Honeywell International Pension Plan covers 96,300 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons