Skip to main content
PensionRisk

North Carolina Retirement Systems vs Honeywell International Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

North Carolina Retirement Systems (A) and Honeywell International Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 87% and 132% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Honeywell International Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to North Carolina Retirement Systems at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 45.1 percentage points (132.2% vs 87.1%). Honeywell International Pension Plan covers 96,300 participants.

MetricNorth Carolina Retirement SystemsHoneywell International Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
82/100 (A)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
87.1%132.2%*
Total Assets$112.0B$16.6B
Total Liabilities$128.6B$12.6B*
Unfunded Liability$16.6B$0*
Participants960,00096,300
1-Year Investment Return6.6%7.2%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorState of North CarolinaHoneywell International

Honeywell International Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to North Carolina Retirement Systems at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 45.1 percentage points (132.2% vs 87.1%). Honeywell International Pension Plan covers 96,300 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons