Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) vs University of California Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
University of California Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 78/100 (B) compared to Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 5.3 percentage points (83.5% vs 78.2%). University of California Retirement Plan covers 305,000 participants.
| Metric | Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) | University of California Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 70/100 (B) | 78/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 78.2% | 83.5%* |
| Total Assets | $37.0B | $82.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $47.3B* | $98.2B |
| Unfunded Liability | $10.3B* | $16.2B |
| Participants | 425,000 | 305,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.1% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | low |
| Sponsor | State of Indiana | University of California |
University of California Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 78/100 (B) compared to Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 5.3 percentage points (83.5% vs 78.2%). University of California Retirement Plan covers 305,000 participants.