Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan vs Deere & Company Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan (A) and Deere & Company Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 124% and 124% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Deere & Company Pension Plan at 100/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 0.0 percentage points (124.0% vs 124.0%). Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan covers 83,076 participants.

MetricJohnson & Johnson Pension PlanDeere & Company Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)100/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
124.0%124.0%
Total Assets$21.1B$21.1B
Total Liabilities$17.0B$17.0B
Unfunded Liability$0$0
Participants83,07683,076
1-Year Investment Return7.5%*7.4%
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorJohnson & JohnsonJohn Deere

Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Deere & Company Pension Plan at 100/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 0.0 percentage points (124.0% vs 124.0%). Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan covers 83,076 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons