Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) vs Deere & Company Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) and Deere & Company Pension Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) grades A while Deere & Company Pension Plan grades A. Funding ratios: 81% vs 124%.

Deere & Company Pension Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Deere & Company Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 42.8 percentage points (124.0% vs 81.2%). Deere & Company Pension Plan covers 83,076 participants.

MetricIllinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF)Deere & Company Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
80/100 (A)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
81.2%124.0%*
Total Assets$51.2B$21.1B
Total Liabilities$63.1B$17.0B*
Unfunded Liability$11.9B$0*
Participants438,00083,076
1-Year Investment Return5.8%7.4%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorState of IllinoisJohn Deere

Deere & Company Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 42.8 percentage points (124.0% vs 81.2%). Deere & Company Pension Plan covers 83,076 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons