Skip to main content
PensionRisk

State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) vs Deere & Company Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) and Deere & Company Pension Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) grades D while Deere & Company Pension Plan grades A. Funding ratios: 44% vs 124%.

Deere & Company Pension Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Deere & Company Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 79.9 percentage points (124.0% vs 44.1%). Deere & Company Pension Plan covers 83,076 participants.

MetricState Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)Deere & Company Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
42/100 (D)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
44.1%124.0%*
Total Assets$22.5B$21.1B
Total Liabilities$51.0B$17.0B*
Unfunded Liability$28.5B$0*
Participants218,00083,076
1-Year Investment Return5.1%7.4%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelcriticallow
SponsorState of IllinoisJohn Deere

Deere & Company Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 79.9 percentage points (124.0% vs 44.1%). Deere & Company Pension Plan covers 83,076 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons