Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) vs Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 5.8 percentage points (78.1% vs 72.3%). Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan covers 228,000 participants.
| Metric | Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) | Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 68/100 (B) | 70/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 72.3% | 78.1%* |
| Total Assets | $24.8B | $56.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $34.3B* | $71.7B |
| Unfunded Liability | $9.5B* | $15.7B |
| Participants | 328,000 | 228,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.9% | 6.7%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Kansas | Boeing Company |
Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 5.8 percentage points (78.1% vs 72.3%). Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan covers 228,000 participants.