Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association (LACERA) vs San Francisco Employees Retirement System

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association (LACERA) (B) and San Francisco Employees Retirement System (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 75% and 87% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

San Francisco Employees Retirement System has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association (LACERA) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 12.1 percentage points (87.3% vs 75.2%). San Francisco Employees Retirement System covers 68,000 participants.

MetricLos Angeles County Employees Retirement Association (LACERA)San Francisco Employees Retirement System
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
70/100 (B)82/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
75.2%87.3%*
Total Assets$73.5B$33.8B
Total Liabilities$97.7B$38.7B*
Unfunded Liability$24.2B$4.9B*
Participants186,00068,000
1-Year Investment Return6.1%6.4%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorLos Angeles CountyCity and County of San Francisco

San Francisco Employees Retirement System has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association (LACERA) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 12.1 percentage points (87.3% vs 75.2%). San Francisco Employees Retirement System covers 68,000 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons