Maryland State Retirement & Pension System vs State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Maryland State Retirement & Pension System has a stronger Pension Health Score of 67/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 28.0 percentage points (72.1% vs 44.1%). Maryland State Retirement & Pension System covers 398,000 participants.
| Metric | Maryland State Retirement & Pension System | State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 67/100 (B)* | 42/100 (D) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 72.1%* | 44.1% |
| Total Assets | $61.0B | $22.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $84.6B | $51.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $23.6B* | $28.5B |
| Participants | 398,000 | 218,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8%* | 5.1% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | critical |
| Sponsor | State of Maryland | State of Illinois |
Maryland State Retirement & Pension System has a stronger Pension Health Score of 67/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 28.0 percentage points (72.1% vs 44.1%). Maryland State Retirement & Pension System covers 398,000 participants.