Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) vs Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 18.0 percentage points (78.1% vs 60.1%). Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan covers 228,000 participants.
| Metric | Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) | Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 54/100 (C) | 70/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 60.1% | 78.1%* |
| Total Assets | $29.0B | $56.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $48.3B* | $71.7B |
| Unfunded Liability | $19.3B | $15.7B* |
| Participants | 322,000 | 228,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.3% | 6.7%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | high | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Mississippi | Boeing Company |
Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 18.0 percentage points (78.1% vs 60.1%). Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan covers 228,000 participants.