Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) vs State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 54/100 (C) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 16.0 percentage points (60.1% vs 44.1%). Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 322,000 participants.
| Metric | Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) | State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 54/100 (C)* | 42/100 (D) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 60.1%* | 44.1% |
| Total Assets | $29.0B | $22.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $48.3B* | $51.0B |
| Unfunded Liability | $19.3B* | $28.5B |
| Participants | 322,000 | 218,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.3%* | 5.1% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | high | critical |
| Sponsor | State of Mississippi | State of Illinois |
Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 54/100 (C) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 16.0 percentage points (60.1% vs 44.1%). Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 322,000 participants.