Skip to main content
PensionRisk

New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) vs IBM Personal Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) (A) and IBM Personal Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 95% and 131% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

IBM Personal Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 35.7 percentage points (131.0% vs 95.3%). IBM Personal Pension Plan covers 140,566 participants.

MetricNew York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS)IBM Personal Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
82/100 (A)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
95.3%131.0%*
Total Assets$248.0B$24.4B
Total Liabilities$260.2B$18.7B*
Unfunded Liability$12.2B$0*
Participants1,070,000140,566
1-Year Investment Return7.1%7.6%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorState of New YorkIBM Corporation

IBM Personal Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 35.7 percentage points (131.0% vs 95.3%). IBM Personal Pension Plan covers 140,566 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons