Skip to main content
PensionRisk

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) vs IBM Personal Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) (A) and IBM Personal Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 97% and 131% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

IBM Personal Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 33.9 percentage points (131.0% vs 97.1%). IBM Personal Pension Plan covers 140,566 participants.

MetricNew York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS)IBM Personal Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
82/100 (A)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
97.1%131.0%*
Total Assets$131.0B$24.4B
Total Liabilities$134.9B$18.7B*
Unfunded Liability$3.9B$0*
Participants433,000140,566
1-Year Investment Return6.8%7.6%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorState of New YorkIBM Corporation

IBM Personal Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 33.9 percentage points (131.0% vs 97.1%). IBM Personal Pension Plan covers 140,566 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons