NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) vs Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 1.3 percentage points (76.8% vs 78.1%). NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) covers 370,000 participants.
| Metric | NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) | Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 71/100 (B)* | 70/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 76.8% | 78.1%* |
| Total Assets | $77.2B | $56.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $100.5B | $71.7B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $23.3B | $15.7B* |
| Participants | 370,000 | 228,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.6% | 6.7%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | New York City | Boeing Company |
NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 1.3 percentage points (76.8% vs 78.1%). NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) covers 370,000 participants.