Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) vs Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 60.5 percentage points (82.5% vs 22.0%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.
| Metric | Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 29/100 (F) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 82.5%* | 22.0% |
| Total Assets | $105.0B | $9.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $127.3B | $43.2B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $22.3B* | $33.7B |
| Participants | 762,000 | 380,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2%* | 4.5% |
| Plan Type | public | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | critical |
| Sponsor | State of Ohio | Teamsters Central States |
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 60.5 percentage points (82.5% vs 22.0%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.