Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) vs Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) and Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) grades A while Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) grades D. Funding ratios: 83% vs 45%.
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.
Verdict
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 37.8 percentage points (82.5% vs 44.7%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.
| Metric | Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) | Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 44/100 (D) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 82.5%* | 44.7% |
| Total Assets | $105.0B | $62.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $127.3B* | $140.5B |
| Unfunded Liability | $22.3B* | $77.7B |
| Participants | 762,000 | 424,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2%* | 4.8% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | critical |
| Sponsor | State of Ohio | State of Illinois |
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 37.8 percentage points (82.5% vs 44.7%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.