Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) vs Washington State Department of Retirement Systems
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 5.3 percentage points (87.8% vs 82.5%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.
| Metric | Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) | Washington State Department of Retirement Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A) | 82/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 82.5% | 87.8%* |
| Total Assets | $105.0B | $108.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $127.3B | $123.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $22.3B | $15.0B* |
| Participants | 762,000 | 528,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2% | 6.7%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Ohio | State of Washington |
Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 5.3 percentage points (87.8% vs 82.5%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.