Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) vs Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 0.8 percentage points (77.3% vs 78.1%). Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 375,000 participants.
| Metric | Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) | Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 72/100 (B)* | 70/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 77.3% | 78.1%* |
| Total Assets | $84.0B | $56.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $108.7B | $71.7B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $24.7B | $15.7B* |
| Participants | 375,000 | 228,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.7% | 6.7%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Oregon | Boeing Company |
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 0.8 percentage points (77.3% vs 78.1%). Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 375,000 participants.