Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) vs State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 33.2 percentage points (77.3% vs 44.1%). Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 375,000 participants.
| Metric | Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) | State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 72/100 (B)* | 42/100 (D) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 77.3%* | 44.1% |
| Total Assets | $84.0B | $22.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $108.7B | $51.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $24.7B* | $28.5B |
| Participants | 375,000 | 218,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.7%* | 5.1% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | critical |
| Sponsor | State of Oregon | State of Illinois |
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 33.2 percentage points (77.3% vs 44.1%). Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 375,000 participants.