State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) vs Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.1 percentage points (80.2% vs 78.1%). State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) covers 507,000 participants.
| Metric | State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) | Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 70/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 80.2%* | 78.1% |
| Total Assets | $90.0B | $56.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $112.2B | $71.7B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $22.2B | $15.7B* |
| Participants | 507,000 | 228,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.0% | 6.7%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Ohio | Boeing Company |
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.1 percentage points (80.2% vs 78.1%). State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) covers 507,000 participants.