State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) vs Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) (A) and Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 80% and 70% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 10.1 percentage points (80.2% vs 70.1%). State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) covers 507,000 participants.
| Metric | State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) | Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 66/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 80.2%* | 70.1% |
| Total Assets | $90.0B | $31.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $112.2B | $44.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $22.2B | $13.4B* |
| Participants | 507,000 | 327,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.0%* | 5.5% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Ohio | State of Texas |
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 10.1 percentage points (80.2% vs 70.1%). State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) covers 507,000 participants.