Skip to main content
PensionRisk

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) vs Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) and Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) grades A while Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) grades D. Funding ratios: 80% vs 45%.

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 35.5 percentage points (80.2% vs 44.7%). State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) covers 507,000 participants.

MetricState Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio)Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
80/100 (A)*44/100 (D)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
80.2%*44.7%
Total Assets$90.0B$62.8B
Total Liabilities$112.2B*$140.5B
Unfunded Liability$22.2B*$77.7B
Participants507,000424,000
1-Year Investment Return6.0%*4.8%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowcritical
SponsorState of OhioState of Illinois

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 35.5 percentage points (80.2% vs 44.7%). State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) covers 507,000 participants.

Explore More