State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) vs Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 7.6 percentage points (87.8% vs 80.2%). Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) covers 218,000 participants.
| Metric | State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) | Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A) | 82/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 80.2% | 87.8%* |
| Total Assets | $90.0B | $36.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $112.2B | $41.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $22.2B | $5.1B* |
| Participants | 507,000 | 218,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.0% | 6.3%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Ohio | Texas Cities |
Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 7.6 percentage points (87.8% vs 80.2%). Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) covers 218,000 participants.