Skip to main content
PensionRisk

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) vs Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) (A) and Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 80% and 88% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 7.6 percentage points (87.8% vs 80.2%). Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) covers 218,000 participants.

MetricState Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio)Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
80/100 (A)82/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
80.2%87.8%*
Total Assets$90.0B$36.8B
Total Liabilities$112.2B$41.9B*
Unfunded Liability$22.2B$5.1B*
Participants507,000218,000
1-Year Investment Return6.0%6.3%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorState of OhioTexas Cities

Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 7.6 percentage points (87.8% vs 80.2%). Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) covers 218,000 participants.

Explore More