State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) vs University of California Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to University of California Retirement Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 3.3 percentage points (80.2% vs 83.5%). State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) covers 507,000 participants.
| Metric | State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) | University of California Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 78/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 80.2% | 83.5%* |
| Total Assets | $90.0B | $82.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $112.2B | $98.2B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $22.2B | $16.2B* |
| Participants | 507,000 | 305,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.0% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Ohio | University of California |
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to University of California Retirement Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 3.3 percentage points (80.2% vs 83.5%). State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) covers 507,000 participants.