Skip to main content
PensionRisk

State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) vs Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) and Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) grades D while Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) grades A. Funding ratios: 44% vs 88%.

Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 43.7 percentage points (87.8% vs 44.1%). Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) covers 218,000 participants.

MetricState Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
42/100 (D)82/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
44.1%87.8%*
Total Assets$22.5B$36.8B
Total Liabilities$51.0B$41.9B*
Unfunded Liability$28.5B$5.1B*
Participants218,000218,000
1-Year Investment Return5.1%6.3%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelcriticallow
SponsorState of IllinoisTexas Cities

Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 43.7 percentage points (87.8% vs 44.1%). Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) covers 218,000 participants.

Explore More