Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) vs Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 56.1 percentage points (78.1% vs 22.0%). Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) covers 1,730,000 participants.
| Metric | Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 72/100 (B)* | 29/100 (F) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 78.1%* | 22.0% |
| Total Assets | $193.0B | $9.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $247.0B | $43.2B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $54.0B | $33.7B* |
| Participants | 1,730,000 | 380,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.1%* | 4.5% |
| Plan Type | public | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | critical |
| Sponsor | State of Texas | Teamsters Central States |
Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 56.1 percentage points (78.1% vs 22.0%). Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) covers 1,730,000 participants.