Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) vs Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 0.7 percentage points (78.1% vs 77.4%). Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) covers 1,730,000 participants.
| Metric | Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) | Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 72/100 (B)* | 70/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 78.1%* | 77.4% |
| Total Assets | $193.0B | $74.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $247.0B | $95.6B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $54.0B | $21.6B* |
| Participants | 1,730,000 | 405,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.1%* | 6.0% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Texas | State of Georgia |
Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 0.7 percentage points (78.1% vs 77.4%). Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) covers 1,730,000 participants.