Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) vs Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) and Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) grades B while Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) grades D. Funding ratios: 78% vs 45%.

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 33.4 percentage points (78.1% vs 44.7%). Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) covers 1,730,000 participants.

MetricTeacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS)Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
72/100 (B)*44/100 (D)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
78.1%*44.7%
Total Assets$193.0B$62.8B
Total Liabilities$247.0B$140.5B*
Unfunded Liability$54.0B*$77.7B
Participants1,730,000424,000
1-Year Investment Return6.1%*4.8%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatecritical
SponsorState of TexasState of Illinois

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 33.4 percentage points (78.1% vs 44.7%). Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) covers 1,730,000 participants.

Explore More