Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) vs Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) and Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) grades B while Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust grades A. Funding ratios: 78% vs 94%.

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 16.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 78.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.

MetricTeacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS)Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
72/100 (B)97/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
78.1%94.1%*
Total Assets$193.0B$55.6B
Total Liabilities$247.0B$59.1B*
Unfunded Liability$54.0B$3.5B*
Participants1,730,000634,861
1-Year Investment Return6.1%6.2%*
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorState of TexasTeamsters Western Conference

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 16.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 78.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.

Explore More