Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust vs Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust and Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust grades A while Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund grades C. Funding ratios: 94% vs 64%.

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 30.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 64.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.

MetricWestern Conference of Teamsters Pension TrustPlumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)*56/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%*64.1%
Total Assets$55.6B$21.0B
Total Liabilities$59.1B$32.8B*
Unfunded Liability$3.5B*$11.8B
Participants634,861430,000
1-Year Investment Return6.2%*5.5%
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowhigh
SponsorTeamsters Western ConferenceUnited Association (UA)

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 30.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 64.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.

Explore More