Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund vs United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund (C) and United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan (D) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 64% and 51% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 56/100 (C) compared to United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan at 49/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 12.6 percentage points (64.1% vs 51.5%). Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund covers 430,000 participants.

MetricPlumbers & Pipefitters National Pension FundUnited Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)*49/100 (D)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.1%*51.5%
Total Assets$21.0B$3.3B
Total Liabilities$32.8B$6.5B*
Unfunded Liability$11.8B$3.1B*
Participants430,00073,913
1-Year Investment Return5.5%*5.0%
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelhighhigh
SponsorUnited Association (UA)UMWA

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 56/100 (C) compared to United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan at 49/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 12.6 percentage points (64.1% vs 51.5%). Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund covers 430,000 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons