Skip to main content
PensionRisk

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund vs United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund and United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund grades A while United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan grades D. Funding ratios: 86% vs 51%.

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan at 49/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 34.4 percentage points (85.9% vs 51.5%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

MetricUFCW International Union Industry Pension FundUnited Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
93/100 (A)*49/100 (D)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
85.9%*51.5%
Total Assets$5.2B$3.3B
Total Liabilities$6.0B*$6.5B
Unfunded Liability$848.9M*$3.1B
Participants365,49473,913
1-Year Investment Return4.8%5.0%*
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowhigh
SponsorUFCW InternationalUMWA

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan at 49/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 34.4 percentage points (85.9% vs 51.5%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons