Skip to main content
PensionRisk

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund vs Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund (A) and Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 86% and 99% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 99/100 (A) compared to UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund at 93/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 12.7 percentage points (98.6% vs 85.9%). Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund covers 44,923 participants.

MetricUFCW International Union Industry Pension FundLaborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
93/100 (A)99/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
85.9%98.6%*
Total Assets$5.2B$4.9B
Total Liabilities$6.0B$5.0B*
Unfunded Liability$848.9M$71.8M*
Participants365,49444,923
1-Year Investment Return4.8%5.3%*
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorUFCW InternationalLIUNA

Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 99/100 (A) compared to UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund at 93/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 12.7 percentage points (98.6% vs 85.9%). Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund covers 44,923 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons