Skip to main content
PensionRisk

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund vs National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund (A) and National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 86% and 74% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 11.6 percentage points (85.9% vs 74.3%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

MetricUFCW International Union Industry Pension FundNational Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
93/100 (A)*80/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
85.9%*74.3%
Total Assets$5.2B$1.5B
Total Liabilities$6.0B$2.0B*
Unfunded Liability$848.9M$523.2M*
Participants365,49418,619
1-Year Investment Return4.8%5.2%*
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorUFCW InternationalIBEW & NECA

UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 11.6 percentage points (85.9% vs 74.3%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons