Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund vs National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund and National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund grades C while National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) grades A. Funding ratios: 64% vs 74%.

National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 10.2 percentage points (74.3% vs 64.1%). National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) covers 18,619 participants.

MetricPlumbers & Pipefitters National Pension FundNational Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)80/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.1%74.3%*
Total Assets$21.0B$1.5B
Total Liabilities$32.8B$2.0B*
Unfunded Liability$11.8B$523.2M*
Participants430,00018,619
1-Year Investment Return5.5%*5.2%
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelhighmoderate
SponsorUnited Association (UA)IBEW & NECA

National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 10.2 percentage points (74.3% vs 64.1%). National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) covers 18,619 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons